Letter from CanRC Synod 2010 to URCNA Synod 2010

I’m going to have more on the last day of Synod later on (probably tomorrow).  However, I did want to share this one item from Wednesday May 26.  This is the letter that was written by our Synod and adopted to be sent to the URCNA Synod in London in July.  It’s a brotherly cri du coeur.

About Wes Bredenhof

Pastor of the Free Reformed Church, Launceston, Tasmania. View all posts by Wes Bredenhof

8 responses to “Letter from CanRC Synod 2010 to URCNA Synod 2010

  • Mike de Groot

    Hi Rev Bredenhof – I thought I read that synod had also decided to ask the URCNA synod to clarify point 6 of the “9 points” and also provide their view of the Framework Hypothesis. Would that be done by seperate letters or how will that be done??

    Thanks,
    Mike

    • Wes Bredenhof

      The Framework Hypothesis issue is closed, according to the CanRC Synod 2010. However, you are correct about the Nine Points. It was decided that the URCNA Synod would be asked to clarify the status of the Nine Points. I’m not sure how that is to be done, but since it isn’t in the letter, I think it will be communicated by our fraternal delegates.

      • Steve Swets

        Mike,
        FYI, there are a couple of overtures coming to the URC synod dealing with the nine points. One overtures asks for the 9 points to be retracted, another asks for a definition of pastoral advice, another gives a list of definitions for things like “pastoral advice.”

        It does seem, in my opinion, from the URC side, their is a realization of extra-confessional binding.

        Rev. Bredenhof, I know you wrote some excellent articles on that topic, but I trust we would agree that there is a bad type of extra confessional binding.

        Blessings,

  • George van Popta

    Too bad about the grammatical error:

    “As a relatively new federation, we can benefit from your drive, enthusiasm and boldness to take the Reformed faith into new areas and places as evidenced by your numerous church plants.”

  • Baus

    So… Wes, has there been a URC Synod reply to this letter ?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: