Canadian Reformed General Synod (5)

According to the website, the following matters are being addressed this morning:

RCUS
ERQ
FRCNA
Appeal Coaldale against article 140 Smithers re: NAPARC
Appeal Attercliffe against article 140 Smithers re: NAPARC
Appeals from Church at Toronto and Burlington Ebenezer  re: article 96 Administering Lord’s Supper to Shut-ins
Appeal Attercliffe against article 83 Smithers Letter
Attercliffe re: SCBP change to Acts of Synod 2007
Letter Winnipeg Redeemer correcting article 111 of Smithers

The NAPARC and Lord’s Supper appeals sound interesting.  Are they appealing against CanRC membership in NAPARC?  That would be sad.  Are the other two  churches appealing against administering the Lord’s Supper to shut-ins?  That would be sad too.  I have an article queued up for Clarion on that second issue, specifically on the approach of Guido de Bres.  He addressed this in passing in his debate with Francois Richardot.  I’m waiting to submit the article until I find out what Synod 2010 does on this.

UPDATE @4:15 PM EST:  I received an e-mail informing me that the appeal of Coaldale is not against membership in NAPARC but has to do with transfers of membership between NAPARC churches.  According to the website, this appeal is back up for further discussion this evening.

About Wes Bredenhof

Pastor of the Free Reformed Church, Launceston, Tasmania. View all posts by Wes Bredenhof

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: