Hart on Frame v. Horton

Daryl Hart adds his thoughts on Frame’s review of Horton’s Christless Christianity.

About Wes Bredenhof

Pastor of the Free Reformed Church, Launceston, Tasmania. View all posts by Wes Bredenhof

One response to “Hart on Frame v. Horton

  • Bill DeJong

    There’s some bad blood between Frame and Horton. Around the time of some past URCNA synod (not sure which one) I and some others met with Mike for a beer. Horton then said, “John Frame is an enemy of the Reformed Faith.” I said to him, “I imagine you don’t want that public.” He replied, “No, I do.” Soon after Frame left WSCAL.

    Frame represents a different perspective than the folks at WSCAL. He’s much more in line with 20 c. Dutch Reformed theologians like Cornelius Van Til, Anthony Hoekema and Herman Ridderbos.

    WSCAL today promotes the framework hypothesis, seemingly regards all the dichotimies and strictures of 17 c. Reformed theologians as pristine theology, promotes (for better or worse, Roman Catholic) natural law theory and (for better or worse, Lutheran) two-kingdom theology, trounces theonomy at ever chance and consigns the likes of Schilder and De Graaf to the bin of semi-Pelagians!!

    John Frame could not sign on to that agenda. Neither can I.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: